PCMark Work 2.0 (Higher is better)
| Device | Performance | Web Browsing | Video Editing | Writing | Photo Editing | Data Manipulation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OnePlus Nord (SD765G) | 9162 | 7997 | 5959 | 10353 | 16465 | 7952 |
| OnePlus 8 (SD865) | 10775 | 8803 | 5892 | 11882 | 26156 | 9010 |
| OnePlus 7T (SD855+) | 10393 | 8500 | 5892 | 11800 | 23308 | 8813 |
| OnePlus 7 (SD855) | 9187 | 7159 | 5790 | 11055 | 19955 | 7157 |
| OnePlus 6T (SD845) | 8546 | 6670 | 5894 | 9910 | 18013 | 6497 |
| OnePlus 5T (SD835) | 7435 | 6494 | 5970 | 8024 | 13316 | 5489 |
| Redmi K20 (SD730) | 8600 | 8296 | 6826 | 7770 | 13965 | 7200 |
PCMark Work 2.0 is great for emulating real-world usage, making it stand out from other synthetic tests. Looking at the overall scores above, the Snapdragon 765G-powered Nord is on the same level as the OnePlus 7, which runs the Snapdragon 855. But let's delve in and see what the individual scores mean.
The web browsing test is targeted at the energy-efficient cores and tests how long it takes a chipset to render a web page and search for content. With six A55 cores chugging along at up to 1.8GHz, the SD765G pulls ahead of the SD855, with only the SD855+ and SD865 posting better figures — and the SD730. It's clear that the dynamic voltage and frequency scaling for Xiaomi is much more aggressive here, allowing the Redmi K20 to post a higher score.
Qualcomm's mid-range chipsets deliver the same performance as its flagship designs from two years ago.
The video editing suite uses OpenGL ES 2.0 and tests video playback, editing, and how long it takes to save the results. All of the OnePlus devices — including the Nord — are in the same ballpark, but the Redmi K20 pulls ahead with a score of 6826. Once again, Xiaomi's aggressive frequency scaling allows it to eke out a higher score.
The writing test is the best indicator to gauge day-to-day performance, and the SD765G posts a marginally higher score than the SD845, with the SD865 and SD855+ firmly in the lead. The SD730 comes in last, but you can see that it is close to the figures posted by the SD835.
PCMark's photo editing test measures how long it takes to open, edit, and save images. This test emulates how your phone handles adding beautify effects or filters, and the SD765G is once again in the same vicinity as the SD845, with the more recent Qualcomm flagships pulling out a huge margin. The SD730, meanwhile, edges out the SD835.
Finally, the data manipulation test measures how long it takes to crunch data from various file formats, and the frame rate while interacting with charts. 90Hz panels do well here, and we're seeing that to be the case on the Nord as well.
Overall, the Snapdragon 765/765G is on par with the Snapdragon 845, suggesting the chipset is not lacking for power. Sure, it may not be as fast as the latest Snapdragon 865 or last year's 855/855+, but the Snapdragon 845 is still going strong in 2020, and the fact that you get the same level of performance on a mid-range chipset shows how far these designs have come in just two years. On that note, the Snapdragon 730 is equivalent to the Snapdragon 835.
The Link LonkAugust 01, 2020 at 07:00PM
https://ift.tt/2XlqLn9
Snapdragon 765 tested: Here's how it compares to the Snapdragon 865 - Android Central
https://ift.tt/3gnoK0A
Snapdragon
No comments:
Post a Comment